Riverville Residences 2 Old Klang Road

Riverville Residences 2 at a glance

• From price: RM 430,000 to RM 625,000
• Asking psf: RM 540–690 per sq ft
• Tenure: Freehold
• Completion: expected 2027
• Units: 660, 36 floors, 3 bedrooms
• Density: about 18 homes a floor (660 units ÷ 36 floors)
• Against other new launches in Old Klang Road: -29% (median RM 761 psf of 2 projects)

Riverville Residences 2 scorecard

Six sub-scores from 0 to 10, each with its formula and inputs. Data-based, not a recommendation; there is no overall total.

• Price vs area: 10.0 / 10 — Lowest asking RM 540 psf vs median RM 761 psf of 2 other new launches in Old Klang Road: -29%. Formula: 5 − (gap % ÷ 5), kept within 0–10. Gap = this project's lowest asking psf against the median lowest asking psf of the other new launches in the same locality (needs 2 or more). Parity = 5; every 5% cheaper adds a point.
• Rail access: not scored — Not enough data on record. Formula: 10 − (walk minutes − 5) ÷ 2, kept within 0–10. Five minutes or less = 10; 25 minutes or more = 0. Walk = measured OpenStreetMap route where one exists, otherwise straight-line × 1.3 at 80 m a minute.
• Density: 4.4 / 10 — 660 units ÷ 36 floors = 18.3 a floor; 63 of 144 other projects pack more. Formula: 10 × share of the portal's projects that put more homes on each floor (units ÷ floors). Fewer homes per floor scores higher.
• Supply pressure in area: not scored — Not enough data on record. Formula: 10 × (1 − pipeline ÷ 50%), kept within 0–10. Pipeline = condominium/apartment units under construction plus planned, as a share of the units already standing (NAPIC stock table). 0% = 10; 50% or more = 0.
• Affordability vs district income: not scored — Not enough data on record. Formula: 10 − 1.5 × (years − 3), kept within 0–10. Years = entry price ÷ (median monthly household income × 12) for the district (DOSM). Three years or less = 10.
• Developer record: not scored — Not enough data on record. Formula: 10, minus 5 for each sick project, 10 for each abandoned project and 3 for each entry on the TEDUH offence list; minus 2 when TEDUH lists fewer than 2 projects (short record). Not scored until the developer is looked up on TEDUH.

Strengths

• Lowest asking psf about 29% below the median of 2 other new launches in Old Klang Road (RM 540 vs RM 761)

Watch-outs

• About 18 homes a floor (660 units over 36 floors)

Where the Riverville Residences 2 asking price sits

Asking psf midpoint RM 615, below the Kuala Lumpur new-launch median of RM 978 (68 projects on this site with an asking psf).

The market around Riverville Residences 2

• House price index (Kuala Lumpur, high-rise): 229.8 in 2026 Q2 (preliminary), +1.5% on 2025 Q2 (NAPIC MHPI, 2010 = 100; covers all of Kuala Lumpur)

Who Riverville Residences 2 suits

• Transit commuter: Weak match (0 of 3 checks) — – Location not on record; – No timetable on record; – No rail route to KL City Centre within the rules. Rule: Walk ≤ 10 min · peak train ≤ 5 min apart · rail to KL City Centre ≤ 35 min
• Own-stay family: Weak match (1 of 3 checks) — ✓ 3-bedroom layouts on the list (3); – Largest layout 915 sq ft; – Nearby schools not on record. Rule: A 3-bedroom layout on record · largest home ≥ 1,000 sq ft · a school within a 10-minute walk
• First-home buyer: Weak match (0 of 3 checks) — – District income not on record; – Smallest layout 803 sq ft, from RM 430,000; – Location not on record. Rule: Entry price ≤ 5 years of district median income · smallest home ≤ 700 sq ft · walk to rail ≤ 10 min
• Rental investor: Weak match (0 of 3 checks) — – Location not on record; – No 1-bedroom layout on record; – Area supply not on record. Rule: Walk to rail ≤ 10 min · 1-bedroom layouts on record · incoming + planned supply < 20% of stock. Rental figures are not on record.

A match is a fit with the numbers, not advice to buy.

Riverville Residences 2: checked facts

Analysis built 2026-10-30 from the figures on this page and public data: NAPIC, DOSM via data.gov.my, KPKT TEDUH, GTFS Static and Rapid Rail ridership via data.gov.my, OpenStreetMap and OSRM. Asking prices are not valuations.